TA的每日心情 | 擦汗
2021-4-24 13:13 |
|---|
签到天数: 104 天 [LV.6]常住居民II
|
本帖最后由 王凡往返 于 2020-11-28 23:04 编辑
! K6 `5 f' q6 p0 h. O9 } g2 m, {
4 h; W$ y3 n4 \IT'S TIME TO TOSS IT OUT$ N) z* ?3 D7 R
; h! q: g3 M p+ u% v4 e
A magazine or news program that spends its cover story or prime time instigating xenophobic antagonism toward a particular country or people should merit no respect and approval. But The Economist, a British weekly magazine, rife with appalling stories targeted particularly at certain countries and figures, has somehow carved out a niche in the press industry. Aimed at what its management calls the "elite groups of society", the magazine focuses primarily on politics and international news, featuring in-depth insight of serious economists and political commentators as well as compelling tittle-tattle culled from inner circles. It's no accident that the topic of China has taken a disproportionately large portion of its every issue since a time no one is able to remember. Then comes this new subtopic from today's seething cauldron of political fodder: cold war.
* @: N+ S0 `6 v# i7 u, q' C* j B5 v2 C4 _$ z# f
The Economist has used its latest cover story to talk up or, in a sense, stoke a second "cold war", which pits a "democratic" alliance made up of the United States and its "like-minded" cohorts against an "authoritarian" China void of Western freedom and polling places. Such an outlook on differing ideologies is dangerously biased, potential to serve as a breeding ground for regional volatility and conflict. It has also betrayed the Western world's self-righteous hypocrisy and pervasive cynicalness.( j/ S& x! W3 H' P5 s- P' i' i
* Y8 Q- D" w- K/ jIt's a crying shame that a "responsible, trustworthy" media platform has been fomenting hatred among peoples, aggravating an already tense international situation. Why don't they act as a peacemaker, urging all parties involved to keep calm and settle down to thrash out their disputes. A few pages of editorials and columns in well-written English may not be able to effectively take the edge off a bitter "cold war" declared by Trump, be it of trade, or tech, or espionage, where no one would die, but how can they pull it off by demonizing a friendly country, simply because it is rising amid a new international order and pulling old bullies off the top seat of round-table meetings? |
本帖子中包含更多资源
您需要 登录 才可以下载或查看，没有账号？免费注册
x
|
发表于 2020-11-28 22:51:38
