TA的每日心情 | 衰 2025-8-19 07:45 |
|---|
签到天数: 1104 天 [LV.10]以坛为家III
|
Professor David Crystal is one the world's foremost linguistic experts. His latest book, The Fight for English (published by OUP) assesses the debate over3 j, F! Q6 Q" c: U3 y& L
rights and wrongs in English usage, with examples from early modern English via Shakespeare and Samuel Johnson to our modern developments such as email and- M1 O: N/ m. C
texting, and explains why he believes that when it comes to spelling and grammar, we should say no to zero tolerance. He chooses his favourite books on the
: H0 N' E" X4 H% Y, ?9 u9 n* B3 @English language.7 m* s+ w: @0 [: q
0 D# }7 x' D; p, V' u& S. G7 y$ g0 g
1. The Oxford English Dictionary
6 P% B C8 k& J6 F
- ]$ l. i2 y$ V1 M2 _7 e: BIf I were ever asked which book I would to take to a desert island, I would opt immediately for the second edition of the unabridged Oxford English& S5 l9 S' [9 P2 v
Dictionary - or OED, as it is popularly called - and hope that the island had an electricity supply so that I could download the online version or use the# |. A/ {( m2 \
CD. It is without doubt the most comprehensive and detailed account of the history of English vocabulary ever. Its process of continual editorial revision$ u+ v1 Y/ G0 M; f8 M, R7 z
provides a voyage of linguistic discovery that, I am happy to say, never comes to an end.+ a# E( j- y+ y) M# _8 ]
2 A% J, Z! `# y* Q
2. The Use of English by Randolph Quirk1 M, }/ l0 V0 g- ~# g3 T2 _9 V
% t) J5 }$ [/ a( P, S e
This is the book that opened my eyes - and the eyes of several generations of English students - to the range, versatility, and flexibility of the English) L6 w7 ]; j# c" [' ?
language. It brought home the importance of always linking the study of language to the study of literature, and in its range of examples from both
) _% f2 G E$ l& vlinguistic and literary sources it gives a perfect illustration of how the subject should be taught. There was a second edition in 1968, and in 1990 it was+ f7 A( Q% g& y1 e) |
replaced by English in Use, which Quirk co-wrote with his wife, Gabriele Stein. But nothing could replace the freshness and impact of the original volume.
9 n$ w1 C, O9 B" y% o2 }& n% ]/ ?, h$ t/ K- n- f/ x
3. A History of the English Language by Albert C Baugh% }4 J) |2 i& x4 x1 G# z
6 H( U: N- T4 }# w6 A; K# HThis book just goes on and on. I used its second (1957) edition when I was an undergraduate and was fascinated by both the range of its coverage and the/ D/ s* q; E. w4 ~
depth of its treatment. It manages to pack an enormous amount of illustrative detail into its 450 or so pages. Numerous other histories of the language have, V% A: l5 {( s, e( C
since been written, but this one holds a special place for its balanced views and accessible scholarship.6 i; ]0 O3 m& ^" \
( A- r X' k. H7 l9 _ U0 X
4. Roget's Thesaurus of English Words and Phrases
% l* X, @0 j, A
4 Z& t& g1 K9 }0 m- uNo name has come to be more synonymous with "thesaurus" than Roget's. He has even become a common noun: I have "a Roget" on my shelves. Indeed I have a
% e4 S' y9 h1 d$ X2 @% Xdozen Rogets, as his thesaurus has now appeared in numerous editions, and has been revised, expanded, and abridged more times than any other. It was a truly( Z' T+ N8 A, ?4 x# o1 i
remarkable work for its period, and anyone who has tried to update it or rework its content (as I have) cannot fail to recognise the enormous labour that
0 E6 f! |' @" h* i5 @( E: ]went into its compilation. It is the best first source of reference we have for those many occasions when we are dimly aware of the meaning we want to
$ s% t: s/ j9 v, g6 Bexpress and are searching for the best word with which to express it.
' Y, ~8 z3 F$ G* |4 v8 ^8 O; S& b$ X' p, _0 m G2 C
5. Mother Tongue by Bill Bryson
7 r5 @, w/ H+ x' A" k `8 F6 ]) i$ H. h K9 y- O0 K
I have the greatest of admiration for non-specialists who take an interest in a subject and explore it with respect and accuracy, adding a level of. F; n6 a% z: G Y7 K
accessibility and an individual slant that academics would do well to emulate. Few have succeeded; and none have succeeded so well as Bill Bryson in this
; `* ^2 j3 ?: h! Kbook. It's a delightful, easy-to-read survey - though with its good humour, wealth of anecdote, and boyish enthusiasm, "romp" would be a better word.4 n* u- [' V" b5 v1 [
* t9 t- \. c0 K6. A Comprehensive Grammar of the English Language by Randolph Quirk, Sidney Greenbaum, Geoffrey Leech, Jan Svartvik. x5 S' Z7 w- v e6 {
This was the grammar I had been waiting for since the 1960s - the first real "reference grammar" of modern times. If you think of a dictionary as a
% J' j5 ?5 D( t: m+ A+ o# Rreference lexicon - a book in which you can look up any word you want and find out all about it - then this book did the same for grammar - or, at least, it
v+ S7 |3 r3 P3 `3 O, R. b; Lmoved closer to that goal than any previous work had done. The Quirk Grammar, as it is often called, is still the book to which I most often refer when
/ V: x$ e, Q# z+ U* bexploring a point of English grammatical usage.' r8 c) T. m8 J
/ ~2 x6 Z7 R2 n: _7. The Longman Grammar of Spoken and Written English by Douglas Biber, Stig Johansson, Geoffrey Leech, Susan Conrad, Edward Finegan
+ |/ X* P1 |$ Q" D% u) n
4 A2 f. V8 E1 [, ]: {. zThe Quirk Grammar was comprehensive in scope, but limited in the statistical information it provided about the different styles of English usage. LGSWE' [) e- ~+ Q4 G5 r/ A' {) A+ j4 I
(pronounced "log-swee") was the first to start filling that gap. It provided a huge amount of data about the differences between British and American
$ M' W% @1 e0 a* \$ a* @% Vgrammar, as well as about several important genres - conversation, fiction, news, and academic prose. Because its descriptive framework was largely the same. x0 R( u7 v6 P+ z2 O% W
as the Quirk Grammar, it proved easy to relate the findings of the two books. I'm always delving into this book.
7 u$ M, [, N$ f9 M# W" j& G( `) \: S3 o) g3 ~7 R
8. The Cambridge History of the English Language (editor-in-chief, Richard M Hogg): X( s2 F. r- M- g4 ?- H1 d7 ?% d8 [
: W6 H2 H& o `' c* D7 i
This amazing project was years in the making, and appeared over a decade from 1992. I'm not surprised it took so long. Marshalling some 50 academics to! m: a# {3 H' a% i L7 {
write major accounts of their field - in some cases, of 100 or so pages - and getting them to submit their pieces on time must have been a Herculean task.. v. @' a: M# |3 B, I
In fact, of course, some of them didn't submit on time, which is why the project took so long! But it was worth it, despite the wait: nothing is likely to1 J: k+ C6 Z2 J$ \
match this history for its range and depth of coverage for a very long time./ T& @1 V4 } ^! L! c
; W6 R+ F$ M: Y& p' i' _- H- L' E9. The Cambridge Guide to English Usage by Pam Peters) }5 M4 w- |1 r$ b4 {
# t8 r. |6 z w. V) P8 f! e, uIf you find it helpful to go to Fowler, Gowers, Partridge, or any of the other famous pundits of the past for advice about English usage, then you will1 I4 ^) ~) J. w5 i
value this book. It is the first usage guide to benefit from the computer age. It is solidly based on a corpus of real data, and it is the first book to be- o( }- k; _! A
truly international, providing information about differences between British, American, Australian, and other regional variants of English. It points the way forward towards the new, internet-fuelled genre of usage guides that will surely emerge in the present century.' b5 F$ o2 ?& C& l+ V0 W% S
' l+ h: n/ r6 }' {2 W
10. The Cambridge Encyclopedia of the English Language by David Crystal+ M" P% s: i& E0 ]3 n- _" B( o
" w) @$ v% g# D1 _$ ~0 f% p
I am often asked which of my own books on this subject I have most enjoyed writing. It is a difficult call, because I always enjoy whatever I happen to be
" I5 y& J- K% v* X& ?- lwriting, and for that brief period the ongoing project is the most important thing in the history of the universe. But this encyclopedia was special. It
- p0 Y [3 d7 l5 R8 I$ `gave me the opportunity to present, for the first time, a full-colour illustrated account of English, and offered me a collaboration with publisher,! \* v0 D( P6 M& C B- k
picture-researcher, photographer and designer which was both challenging and highly creative. And it all started because the son of a friend asked me why he& B6 ~. u. x6 g9 b6 ~: ]
couldn't find a book on the English language with pictures in it.
3 F8 p& g: O2 Z! k" e) @( S* @* R |
|