TA的每日心情 | 开心 2020-3-25 07:07 |
---|
签到天数: 5 天 [LV.2]偶尔看看I
|
several在法律中指称责任/义务时,表示分别的,各自的,joint才表示连带,但是《英华大词典》对这个词的解释错了。
; W$ m6 x* n% ^
9 h( |1 B4 n2 h! F《英华大词典》第三版,商务印书馆,第1409页:
w7 J1 O$ U2 `5.【法】有连带责任的。, G' |$ \8 M+ e2 w* H
5 `& ]; n; ~( A9 Z5 L4 Y2 Q再看ODE的解释:6 T7 ]: V1 O0 O0 D
Law applied or regarded separately. Often contrasted with joint。
3 n7 ^, Z, n( P- j明确说明了是separately; 而且与joint是相对的,不是同样的意思。
2 g; W$ C+ t4 [" I* r2 I$ K& C* e* k3 ]
再看W3:5 z0 V7 P4 C* |/ A
specifically : enforceable separately against each party, H9 j) `# i; m! ?+ f9 s& [, \
the contractual liability of each company to insured is several and not joint — R. E. Keeton
6 H D8 V" g+ s9 Y4 U) j) M— compare joint 2b(3), joint and several% `8 M5 _8 }6 Q0 D* k
8 w' q9 X I1 F/ d+ H明确说明了:specifically, separately, against each party, not joint.
1 w, T* v; d$ E+ z |
|