TA的每日心情 | 怒 2019-10-10 16:16 |
|---|
签到天数: 11 天 [LV.3]偶尔看看II
|
本帖最后由 四包包子 于 2019-10-7 21:27 编辑 + k5 P. r; K+ s" c0 u; }0 A
; j0 `: o2 q. Z) Z4 F9 |原文如下:6 E" q1 U$ y! k% n
Only in following power everywhere that it operates does freedom have a good chance of flourishing. Only by analysing power in its multiplicity, as Foucault did, do we have a chance to mount a multiplicity of freedoms that would counter all the different ways in which power comes to define the limits of who we can be.. c8 {9 J" h' J4 s! @
中文大概意思如下:) y w! l) R. o, S2 F' Q
只有在权力运作的每个地方都去追踪权力的脚步,自由才有机会蓬勃发展。只有像福柯那样分析权力的多样性,我们才有机会增加自由的多样性。权力对我们能够成为什么样的人进行定义并设限,而自由将帮助我们对抗权力的所有不同形式。8 f& a7 u6 N1 G% \5 P. o
" n0 x$ s8 C+ Z! z# l请看第一句话。这明显是only提至句首,句子倒装,其中does是提到主语freedom前的助动词。
/ ]9 s7 O6 y. s9 p所以全句正过来就是:7 N: ]* t+ E: A+ r" o
Freedom has a chance of flourishing only in following power everywhere THAT it operates.
2 R, u: N& b5 [4 S
" D# k! ^# Y j4 Y但问题是那个that是怎么回事?这里的everywhere显然引导了一个状语从句,那that就是多余的啊。
' d D) B+ W. v1 }. X$ S
0 i- S, T7 E) h- t; t
) w# [* U v) v- c, T2 f1 q3 I, `& }: `. O
文章出处:https://aeon.co/essays/why-foucaults-work-on-power-is-more-important-than-ever1 R$ j3 Q' @9 ?4 {% Q" M
8 n. n, c1 J( C0 M+ A- ^2 Z4 R! n: f# L! Q
|
本帖子中包含更多资源
您需要 登录 才可以下载或查看,没有账号?免费注册
x
|