TA的每日心情 | 开心 2019-12-18 19:08 |
|---|
签到天数: 5 天 [LV.2]偶尔看看I
|
本帖最后由 鸭呼嘿 于 2019-10-13 15:55 编辑 2 O% e" w. w/ X0 V9 l
" p0 _, o8 l% N4 p/ f0 p" A... The two good phrases to delete are "you know" and "you might be thinking".
! z" E7 [5 L* q V- c- {) X1 a5 u) k" U8 @: t9 f
8 |8 I! O/ _9 V/ M2 P2 ]
. h# l% n3 W2 V3 x4 c3 zWhich way of analysis is correct? Or neither is?
+ R& b/ X# _3 H. u6 k) S' J% _
8 a X& \% M2 j! Q/ B4 q& c3 y" q+ E
% i4 i9 h6 S, `- j. c- v U; yPattern 1:* o6 W* `" U2 N. i
4 M6 p N2 h' n& D' u8 V8 ], Z8 A
3 {8 j* T& A( j3 N J; q8 C
* S* Y' Y p+ ?% C: V! K
The two good phrases: subject
8 i# r- C' F& X8 {! N1 u" m0 M0 ~# \( R! j8 I
To delete: attributive' P7 s; H9 [: Q' c! X. _! E, ~/ m
. j# q$ Y" B1 S9 V4 _
Are: linking verb% R! f! l8 M1 i9 y1 ]. A
7 r5 l/ n9 |5 s; E) L6 ?* ~5 @
"You know" and "you might be thinking": predicative# Q' P7 J- B9 E& f
' _: o$ c9 Y: u _* u f& K
+ h# d5 j1 M4 o" F/ H
+ R0 a% k3 m4 u! y0 NSemantic function of infinitive: to indicate "propriety/obligation/necessity"[?]
z4 z+ F, j4 g+ p
5 \5 v; h4 ?' E; g4 @$ x m+ T* E, W6 j
1 h1 F, d3 ]- c+ z+ s. a5 ~% ^Pattern 2:) d1 ~' a: ]7 k& u% o" h. T
3 Y: N( l# H8 T6 X. q1 {0 d; B......
& Z% B& m+ T5 H g6 Y4 L5 ^# ?+ h
To delete: predicative& o, I, a1 n% S
; x y! a$ h! s. u# ~! s
"You know" and "you might be thinking": apposotive (of the subject "the two good phrases")
7 A! J: c! o( O
/ R4 o4 u& A M+ K5 b( k4 _9 y }2 U
' o0 G! N1 s) h2 o
Underlying synonymous sentence in a more "common" word order: The two good phrases "You know" and "you might be thinking" are to delete.
( ~) E& g- D+ K2 C
1 Z. Z! z3 i0 ]1 u. E# M
% J; k( k$ E, g. }* F( A% H4 ?
4 Y4 L9 o' ~: c$ p1 `7 _8 C* L- y' wSemantic function of fixed phrase "to be infinitive": to indicate propriety/obligation/necessaty
% I4 X R0 c) ^- U3 o% y
- U- I1 \8 B2 |) R+ u[如果发错版有劳版主移动]。 |
|