我关于最近“CNN报道中国首枚金牌”报道标题的评论

pan

6 a! l6 `$ V/ J6 ?https://weibo.com/1157864602/Kqe ... 6&mod=weibotime

- V3 m; C" E, F2 Q
; b5 }* p  ~1 k. q4 g5 `. {8 c
1 k6 T5 |4 z8 e1 Y% d

6 T$ q! {" }3 h0 g) H**

8 f9 Z$ K$ C6 {& N" ]* v" eMy comment in my WeChat Group:
7 |1 z0 [# M3 i0 {$ n' l# wThe way they made the headline made many Chinese netizens furious.
Calling it "controversial" is an understatement.

. O; s  B  K, v( R( V+ fCNN is either innocent and ignorant of the cultural difference and stupid for the professionalism, or it is mean and resentful at China's first gold winning so much so it had to mix the two completely different cases together as one news headline.
: o/ r) k( _$ q2 o
Either way, it puts CNN in a very negative, unprofessional and unethical light.

And I don't blame the Chinese netizens. If you ask me, it's a classical Freudian slip if it's anything. @M
; d! d( @0 m3 y- X$ A& k( B$ v5 _4 mI bet CNN is laughing up their sleeves, gloating over how clever they are to make such a headline and make China look bad, or at least less good.
5 H8 v. ]& J, B) u1 r
& f/ w- b& N3 ^( J& G其他网友的评论就不方便发上来了。
5 i" T1 |% _5 `" T. t5 N4 \
" y% K1 }; X2 b' uPan.
7 P; I5 X9 U9 E* u9 E

pan

Understood.

4 F  _4 Q' l& m0 L9 kBut it's CNN. You'd expect them to know better. But what's to separate CNN from any garden-variety tabloids anway.

; T' k4 S  B) j. ^, }Doesn't surprise me.

But I think there's nothing (really) wrong for anybody or any news agencies to be political or politically biased. But shouldn't there be a line somewhere? If that line is so easily and so summarily crossed every time they feel the urge, what does that make them?