什么时候用not，什么时候用no？

荣晓荣晓

2 h4 q/ @3 I7 v3 g8 T
6 H  k1 N- P, N# @0 ^3 Z) f经常说
no是形容词，后面不能接冠词(a, the...)
: x( m8 }9 m0 X8 A. m  \; \5 v1 Lnot是副词，后面有冠词
  k$ N# _  m' |+ @' o
那为什么朗文的这个例句用了not而不是no呢？
$ z/ o6 N4 [& }% ]: S- YIt was not hyperbole to call it the worst storm in twenty years

大橙子

no 否定名词，not 否定动词

荣晓荣晓

大橙子 发表于 2021-10-31 15:42
' h* n4 o7 A+ ?no 否定名词，not 否定动词

; K) d3 N; ]- ^
% q* ~& h3 z7 @6 I: E' w所以这个例句中应该用no还是not
! q* L- e+ H1 i# j
再比如 There is no one in the room. 还是 There is not one in the room.

大橙子

荣晓荣晓 发表于 2021-10-31 18:05
所以这个例句中应该用no还是not

再比如 There is no one in the room. 还是 There is not one in the ro ...

主楼例句用 not
# X9 R" H% |) _7 oThere is no one in the room. 对

以下摘自 Practical English Usage：
9 z4 ~) R# C( D( }: G" y

We can use no with a noun or -ing form to mean ‘not any', or 'not a/an’.
5 |) y/ B% H; }$ ^
No teachers went on strike. (= There weren’t any teachers on strike.)
* H' `$ n6 s9 _* uI’ve got no Thursdays free this term. (= I haven't got any Thursdays . . .)
I telephoned, but there was no answer. (= There wasn’t an answer.)
% t; q9 f' Z9 k4 t" LNO SMOKING
3 Y% a7 P# X- ]/ P5 F$ p
Sometimes sentences constructed with verb + not and no + noun have similar
meanings. The structure with no is usually more emphatic.

There wasn't an answer. / There was no answer.

荣晓荣晓

大橙子 发表于 2021-10-31 20:39
3 m0 T# k0 K8 ~5 W! D主楼例句用 not
* m0 e; T4 o; m+ h0 EThere is no one in the room. 对

1 f0 t0 w" Q. E6 \
) Y8 u$ ^& G* {8 B注意到Practical English Usage中的例句都只涉及可数名词，所以才有了not an answer, no answer的结构可以套用。
5 B. A+ W( w( Z而朗文例句中的hyperbole 是不可数名词，无法套用了，

大橙子

荣晓荣晓 发表于 2021-10-31 23:05
9 z1 X! M7 |3 Q3 s( a8 v注意到Practical English Usage中的例句都只涉及可数名词，所以才有了not an answer, no answer的结构可 ...

嗯，你看得很仔细，它这里确实没给不可数名词的例句

书中另一处给了不可数名词的例句，并且再次说了下两者的区别，用 no 属于更强调的语气

No can be used instead of not a or not any when we want to emphasise a
" W( q4 F# ^1 F& Onegative idea.
5 N# u2 m8 M+ H+ R3 ]* s2 q2 D) z" j9 NWould you believe it? There’s no mirror in the bathroom! (More emphatic than
2 ]" {! K  F) ~1 u; ?5 r* [. . . There isn’t a mirror . . .)
: M# |0 u$ Z7 d4 mSorry I can’t stop. I ’ve got no time. (More emphatic than . . . I haven't got any
& d) X* E; {& ~- E8 M3 ztime.)
; O- u% ?8 m9 N; F/ L) l9 cThere were no messages for you this morning, I'm afraid. (More emphatic than
There weren't any messages . . .)

0 x# s: G; o9 U& U! c) M6 @

We prefer not a/any in objects and complements when the sense is not
' G# ^0 ~6 Q- t4 |8 ^* `1 l" Hemphatic. Compare:
% n3 t7 d  R, @7 PHe’s no fool. (= He's not a fool at all. - emphatic negative)
A whale is not a fish, (n o t A whale is no fish - the sense is not emphatic.)

7 Z, X# p; Z' }2 J  t. W

荣晓荣晓

大橙子 发表于 2021-11-1 09:55
3 u9 A/ Q$ b7 j3 ]7 w1 E2 X1 Z嗯，你看得很仔细，它这里确实没给不可数名词的例句

书中另一处给了不可数名词的例句，并且再次说了下两 ...

所以no 和 not a/any 之间进行互换
那我怎么觉得朗文的例句用no也行啊。hyperbole不可数，他也没有加any，却只有一个not。

大橙子

荣晓荣晓 发表于 2021-11-1 10:25
- J5 \" X8 k. l! Z1 @  g; H所以no 和 not a/any 之间进行互换
那我怎么觉得朗文的例句用no也行啊。hyperbole不可数，他也没有加any ...

4 w; A7 E) Q6 G  e用 no 也不算错的，只是意思不同，变得更强调，词典例句是正常语气说话，用不着这么强调
如果是在跟人争论，对方非说这是 hyperbole，你说这根本不是 hyperbole，就可以用 no

因为这里不是在讲数量，而是单纯的否定。
" V7 l7 {& }* B4 Q1 l' K6 ~
做个简单对比：
It was [a pleasure 可数] to meet you.  否定：It was not [a pleasure] ...
It is [hyperbole 不可数] to call it...       否定：It is not [hyperbole] ...
6 a3 e+ j: ~3 _/ H% c
如果真的要用 no hyperbole，可以说 there is no hyperbole in calling it... 注意这里用了there is

渔夫和妖怪

冠词分为定冠词、不定冠词和零冠词，这里就是”零冠词+不可数名词“（not + 零冠词 + hyperbole）

荣晓荣晓

渔夫和妖怪 发表于 2021-11-7 12:57
冠词分为定冠词、不定冠词和零冠词，这里就是”零冠词+不可数名词“（not + 零冠词 + hyperbole） ...

那为什么不能用no呢，

渔夫和妖怪

He is not a fool.他不傻。
! d2 W- b. m0 i8 c- F4 m/ k2 ?He is no fool.他才不傻。（他精着呢。）