TA的每日心情 | 慵懒
2019-1-23 10:04 |
|---|
签到天数: 122 天 [LV.7]常住居民III
|
发表于 2019-5-4 15:36:20
|
显示全部楼层
逆风的香 发表于 2019-5-3 18:00) |8 U4 {* F& p- ^ q
真题解析给的翻译：
* y# N. I' P! A, r6 `* f$ N! ~
- u9 N% n* D# [% {& ]7 z这么翻译是很通顺的，但翻译后的汉语中“意识”后接宾语的是“这些潮流”，而非“方 ...
A. 宾语+定语从句：$ Z* T) p, t( ]6 C. t
we have discovered that managers often fail to recognize [the less obvious but profound ways] (in which) these trends are influencing consumers' aspirations, attitudes, and behaviors.
; B# F8 ]5 h' Q$ k. ]/ {! q9 p这就是原句所用的语法结构："the less obvious but profound ways" 是 recognize 的宾语；
5 \- d9 u! ^! F) k0 a+ W% M+ F"(in which) these trends... behaviors"这个定语从句修饰该宾语。
0 n$ w8 T% W7 n+ X# `3 B: N/ [7 Z8 D" i9 v: M, V* i+ S
而真题解析出于使译文更通顺流畅的考虑，将原句转换成了下面的句式来翻译。% q& @: b- S! K) u: ?/ X+ u
8 ]0 ~: C5 m4 e; k: [: t
B. 宾语从句：
- ]- s1 I. x6 |& Fwe have discovered that managers often fail to recognize [(that) these trends are influencing consumers' aspirations, attitudes, and behaviors (in) the less obvious but profound ways.
"these trends... profound ways" 整个从句是 recognize 的宾语，而不是 these trends 俩词作宾语；
8 `: y3 l5 y6 ^0 _9 M1 |& k7 _"(in) the less obvious but profound ways" 作状语修饰 "these trends... behaviors" 。
) r: V6 w% @5 ] V' a( D, u% y) }3 ?; X' p- E' |' g$ B2 o
个人感觉，这里作状语用时复数 ways 显得很别扭，单数 way 更自然，即 (in) the less obvious but profound way，除非将它改成 in less obvious but profound ways，即：we have discovered that managers often fail to recognize [(that) these trends are influencing consumers' aspirations, attitudes, and behaviors in less obvious but profound ways].
; t% P* Q+ V: T0 V% A7 m上述 A 和 B 虽然意思差不多，但语法结构不一样，含义也有细微差别。* P' f: x# k! c/ S. }: l, g. x
A 结构强调的是 "（多种）不显著但却意义深远的方式"，这些方式是经理们没能意识到的；而 B 结构强调的是 "这些潮流正在以（多种）并不显著但却意义深远的方式影响着消费者的渴望、态度和行为"这件事，这件事是经理们没能意识到的。) p6 {% D! K* H V& S1 e
+ ?& o! U) c! G' _' i( L举个不太恰当但是同理的例子：3 o2 g7 K8 ^2 |& {
- This apple is big.
- This is a big apple.1 \/ P2 h! I4 Y0 `" t
# r( p0 i( `, B* C: k8 Y |
评分
-
2
查看全部评分
-
|
楼主: 逆风的香
发表于 2019-5-4 22:20:03
楼主